RT @RobertWager1: Interesting read about climate sensitivity ECS's https://t.co/v5IwaX6RpT
@SallyPa50765326 @8unch0fnumb3rs @EmilyKerr36 https://t.co/vjdF95izvX https://t.co/abeRyxemYW are not available to me. If you can access the original papers listed feel free to DM me pdf copies.
ECS isn’t a thing, cuz Dynamics is King.
Interesting read about climate sensitivity ECS's https://t.co/v5IwaX6RpT
@lailakaasik @KeitKasemets Täpselt. Igasugu jutte on olnud :) Pluto oli kunagi planeet ja värki. IPCC mudelite tugevat kallutatust on mitmed teadustööd toonud välja https://t.co/k39YSSdOsn
@krepssound Et IPCC mudelid räigelt hindavad üle soojenemist ei ole uudis https://t.co/k39YSSdOsn
@RushhourP @25_cycle @TomPlesier Some papers with a slightly lower TCR. https://t.co/VDaWNUPxsu https://t.co/7zFNRQA0lv https://t.co/bzzFnbxS9x
@LewisQuinn3 @poppymillward1 @PeaceAss1 @COP26 @BorisJohnson @sciencemuseum @10DowningStreet Nature, 1994, Satellite Greenhouse Signal, Christy & McNider. Confirmed in 2017 by the same authors: https://t.co/PIYsXfxgTw
@agrprog @MERuijtenberg @PieterdeLange54 @Greenpeace Nou, dit onderzoek laat zien dat een flink deel van de opwarming wel eens door het wegvallen van vulkanische activiteit zou kunnen komen. https://t.co/CPCYhcWYXC . .
RT @tan123: Remember, this is peer-reviewed science, so it has to be Truth or something. #ClimateBrawl https://t.co/J9wRQEM3h8
RT @tan123: Remember, this is peer-reviewed science, so it has to be Truth or something. #ClimateBrawl https://t.co/J9wRQEM3h8
RT @tan123: Remember, this is peer-reviewed science, so it has to be Truth or something. #ClimateBrawl https://t.co/J9wRQEM3h8
Remember, this is peer-reviewed science, so it has to be Truth or something. #ClimateBrawl
Christy and McNider (2017) "The models’ response to carbon dioxide is twice what we see in the real world". https://t.co/Dt4bRotguB https://t.co/CLBpYBHytY
@de_Kattekop @Klimaatzuster @PushingPenguin @Opiniepanel @EenVandaag @klimaatVeranda Er zijn dus meerdere universiteiten die al decennia onderzoek door 'sceptici' betalen. @de_Kattekop wil 'Internet verwijzingen' naar hun onderzoek: https://t.co/piY6ievKk
@ScottAdamsSays @SteveSGoddard @PerryCampbell5 @LarsUllern86 @BillNye They greatly overestimate the sensitivity of the climate to CO2 levels. Dr. John Christy and Dr. Judith Curry have done good research on this, & both (independently) found the climat
4B/x Re: "they don't adequately address evidence that issues in external forcings predominately explain the difference" Christy admitted in other research that he cannot totally discount the external forcings explanation: https://t.co/U9Ic0m8j6z https:/
6A/z They don't adequately support their claim that their results show that the models get the lapse rate feedback wrong. Christy previously admitted he didn't adequately address alternative explanations. Page 517: https://t.co/kplTPUMmIB
5B/z Re: "Christy's use of tropospheric trends to:" Christy does this in places such as: https://t.co/xwa4B2UEKD https://t.co/iSVzj4RZ9c
2C/x And Christy knows his cumulative indices are arbitrary, with accumulation undermining attempts to use those indices to predict or explain temperature trends. So Christy destroys his own argument. Page 514: https://t.co/iSVzj59AxM https://t.co/pzNbNf
Re: "when I got to CUM MEI I stopped reading. Thats as bad as cum TSI" Christy admits to this point in his peer-reviewed research, thus destroying his core argument in his "hot spot" blog articles. Page 514: https://t.co/iSVzj59AxM https://t.co/nc8vcYPTt
Satellite bulk tropospheric temperatures as a metric for #climate sensitivity. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci. (2017) John Christy and Richard T. McNider https://t.co/Ld3aJjRgVF Removing main natural impacts, estimate of underlying, potentially human-forced trend
If the models don't work, the science they're based on isn't science. https://t.co/n24RWru6Vi
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
@brandonrgates @kmpetersson 4B/x Christy cited that non-peer-reviewed garbage to Congress: page 10: https://t.co/01vH1bhXWP "Indeed, I am a co-author of a report [...]" https://t.co/cA7rKp2Uaz In his peer-reviewed work, Christy then contradicted his no
@brandonrgates @kmpetersson 3B/x Christy admits that CO2 caused observable, significant post-1979 tropospheric warming: https://t.co/kplTPUuLR3 Another person concurs, using the garbage UAHv6.0 analysis: https://t.co/9BOB4k4IwV
@brandonrgates @kmpetersson 2B/x Christy uses a non-cumulative MEI (the one sensible people use, instead of the ridiculous cumulative MEI virtually no one uses) to show the ocean cycles like ENSO did not cause most of post-1970s warming Pages 512 and 517
https://t.co/AmLX4Ietvl global temperatures are going up more slowly than projected by most climate models #science
RT @gjvu: Hoppa, wederom een wetenschappelijke publicatie waaruit blijkt dat met de verschrikkelijke CO2 opwarming allemaal wel iets meeval…
RT @gjvu: Hoppa, wederom een wetenschappelijke publicatie waaruit blijkt dat met de verschrikkelijke CO2 opwarming allemaal wel iets meeval…
RT @gjvu: Hoppa, wederom een wetenschappelijke publicatie waaruit blijkt dat met de verschrikkelijke CO2 opwarming allemaal wel iets meeval…
RT @gjvu: Hoppa, wederom een wetenschappelijke publicatie waaruit blijkt dat met de verschrikkelijke CO2 opwarming allemaal wel iets meeval…
RT @gjvu: Hoppa, wederom een wetenschappelijke publicatie waaruit blijkt dat met de verschrikkelijke CO2 opwarming allemaal wel iets meeval…
RT @gjvu: Hoppa, wederom een wetenschappelijke publicatie waaruit blijkt dat met de verschrikkelijke CO2 opwarming allemaal wel iets meeval…
Hoppa, wederom een wetenschappelijke publicatie waaruit blijkt dat met de verschrikkelijke CO2 opwarming allemaal wel iets meevalt. #ECS van circa 1 graad C. https://t.co/TUIFibbSoh
Enjoying those finely picked cherries @LamarSmithTX21 ?! Of course you didn't read this either.. https://t.co/ntxUTvcsNn
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
1 deg. in 100 years global avg. temperature increase. I think we will survive. Thank you fossil fuels for giving us better shelter, forecasting, and preparedness. https://t.co/StKe2YhjSg
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
Actual Univ of Alabama-Huntsville climate scientists (as opposed to pseudo-scientific climate scientologists): Earth’s atmosphere NOT warming at “accelerated rate” in past 23 yrs, confirming that “climate models” grossly overestimate “CO2 sensitivity” htt
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
RT @RossMcKitrick: In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found a…
In a '94 Nature paper Christy measured backgrd tropospheric warming of +0.09K/decade. Now with >2x the data they found almost the same: +0.1K/decade. Implied GHG effect is half that in IPCC models https://t.co/8VJIYjafaa