↓ Skip to main content

Macroscopic Unobservability of Spinorial Sign Changes

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Theoretical Physics, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Macroscopic Unobservability of Spinorial Sign Changes
Published in
International Journal of Theoretical Physics, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10773-015-2657-4
Authors

Richard D. Gill

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2014.
All research outputs
#6,778,538
of 11,340,603 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Theoretical Physics
#152,055
of 556,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,477
of 253,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Theoretical Physics
#4,175
of 21,805 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,340,603 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 556,758 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21,805 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.