| Title |
Functional Land Management: Bridging the Think-Do-Gap using a multi-stakeholder science policy interface
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-017-0983-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lilian O’Sullivan, David Wall, Rachel Creamer, Francesca Bampa, Rogier P. O. Schulte |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 5 | 18% |
| France | 3 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Slovenia | 2 | 7% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| China | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 64% |
| Scientists | 9 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 21% |
| Researcher | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 25 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,812,855
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#312
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,471
of 451,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#4
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.