↓ Skip to main content

Ileocecal ulcers accompanied by relapsing polychondritis: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Ileocecal ulcers accompanied by relapsing polychondritis: a case report
Published in
SpringerPlus, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-3-714
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoko Kawakami, Katsuya Endo, Tomonori Ishii, Sho Haneda, Fumiyoshi Fujishima, Yoichi Kakuta, Hisashi Shiga, Yoshitaka Kinouchi, Tooru Shimosegawa

Abstract

Mouth and genital ulcers with inflamed cartilage (MAGIC) syndrome is a rare overlap syndrome that includes features characteristic of both Behçet's disease (BD) and relapsing polychondritis (RP).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 40%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 60%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2014.
All research outputs
#14,791,252
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#834
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,537
of 360,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#43
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.