↓ Skip to main content

Post-Fire Recovery of Eucalypt-Dominated Vegetation Communities in the Sydney Basin, Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Fire Ecology, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Post-Fire Recovery of Eucalypt-Dominated Vegetation Communities in the Sydney Basin, Australia
Published in
Fire Ecology, December 2016
DOI 10.4996/fireecology.1203053
Authors

Jessica T. Heath, Chris J. Chafer, Thomas F. A. Bishop, Floris F. Van Ogtrop

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 15 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 12%
Engineering 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Unknown 12 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2019.
All research outputs
#5,610,213
of 17,367,552 outputs
Outputs from Fire Ecology
#70
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,406
of 419,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fire Ecology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,367,552 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them