↓ Skip to main content

Predicting and Communicating Risk of Clinical Deterioration: An Observational Cohort Study of Internal Medicine Residents

Overview of attention for article published in JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Predicting and Communicating Risk of Clinical Deterioration: An Observational Cohort Study of Internal Medicine Residents
Published in
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11606-014-3114-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

John T. Ratelle, Diana J. Kelm, Andrew J. Halvorsen, Colin P. West, Amy S. Oxentenko

Abstract

Despite its importance, little is known about internal medicine (IM) residents' ability to assess and communicate a patient's overnight risk during the resident-to-resident handoff.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 13%
Lecturer 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Other 5 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Engineering 2 13%
Unspecified 2 13%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Other 1 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2015.
All research outputs
#3,605,642
of 13,227,097 outputs
Outputs from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,026
of 4,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,943
of 295,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#48
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,227,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.