↓ Skip to main content

Predicting and Communicating Risk of Clinical Deterioration: An Observational Cohort Study of Internal Medicine Residents

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Predicting and Communicating Risk of Clinical Deterioration: An Observational Cohort Study of Internal Medicine Residents
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11606-014-3114-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

John T. Ratelle, Diana J. Kelm, Andrew J. Halvorsen, Colin P. West, Amy S. Oxentenko

Abstract

Despite its importance, little is known about internal medicine (IM) residents' ability to assess and communicate a patient's overnight risk during the resident-to-resident handoff.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Lecturer 3 11%
Librarian 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 8 29%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 36%
Social Sciences 3 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2015.
All research outputs
#13,376,502
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,885
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,748
of 368,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#61
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.