↓ Skip to main content

Ecohydrological processes and ecosystem services in the Anthropocene: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Processes, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
Title
Ecohydrological processes and ecosystem services in the Anthropocene: a review
Published in
Ecological Processes, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13717-017-0104-6
Authors

Ge Sun, Dennis Hallema, Heidi Asbjornsen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 174 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 16%
Student > Master 27 16%
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Other 10 6%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 52 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 48 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 11%
Engineering 12 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 7%
Arts and Humanities 4 2%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 59 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2018.
All research outputs
#19,053,776
of 24,265,140 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Processes
#138
of 264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,711
of 332,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Processes
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,265,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.