| Title |
Integration of homeopathy and complementary medicine in the public health system in Italy: national regulation and regional experiences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medicine and the Person, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12682-014-0187-0 |
| Authors |
E. Rossi, M. Picchi, Marialessandra Panozzo, M. Di Stefano, S. Baccetti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 610 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 109 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 48 | 8% |
| Canada | 21 | 3% |
| India | 17 | 3% |
| Japan | 13 | 2% |
| Spain | 13 | 2% |
| Italy | 10 | 2% |
| Germany | 8 | 1% |
| Australia | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 59 | 10% |
| Unknown | 306 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 544 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 35 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 15 | 2% |
| Scientists | 11 | 2% |
| Unknown | 5 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 18% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 18% |
| Researcher | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 422. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2020.
All research outputs
#69,728
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medicine and the Person
#1
of 24 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#602
of 371,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medicine and the Person
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one scored the same or higher as 23 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them