↓ Skip to main content

Wetting Transitions for a Random Line in Long-Range Potential

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Statistical Physics, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Wetting Transitions for a Random Line in Long-Range Potential
Published in
Journal of Statistical Physics, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10955-015-1296-8
Authors

P. Collet, F. Dunlop, T. Huillet

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2014.
All research outputs
#3,098,807
of 4,531,279 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Statistical Physics
#133,997
of 284,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,229
of 139,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Statistical Physics
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,531,279 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284,260 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.