The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Effect of Perineal Self-Acupressure on Constipation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11606-014-3084-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ryan Abbott, Ian Ayres, Ed Hui, Ka-Kit Hui |
Abstract |
The efficacy of perineal self-acupressure in treating constipation is uncertain. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 19% |
Canada | 2 | 8% |
Japan | 1 | 4% |
Sweden | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 17 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 69% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 19% |
Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 70 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 20% |
Unknown | 29 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 20% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 31 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 180. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#233,751
of 26,220,821 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#200
of 8,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,424
of 372,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,220,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.