↓ Skip to main content

Gerrymandering and computational redistricting

Overview of attention for article published in arXiv, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
241 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Gerrymandering and computational redistricting
Published in
arXiv, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s42001-019-00053-9
Authors

Olivia Guest, Frank J. Kanayet, Bradley C. Love

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 241 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 57%
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 29%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Psychology 1 14%
Neuroscience 1 14%
Computer Science 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 163. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2019.
All research outputs
#91,884
of 13,998,077 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#1,167
of 532,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,265
of 314,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#75
of 22,868 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,998,077 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 532,411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22,868 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.