↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Chemistry of Natural Compounds, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 260)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Published in
Chemistry of Natural Compounds, January 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1024140915526
Authors

M. M. Garazd, Ya. L. Garazd, V. P. Khilya

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 23%
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Master 3 23%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 38%
Chemistry 4 31%
Unspecified 2 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Chemical Engineering 1 8%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,935,448
of 13,266,991 outputs
Outputs from Chemistry of Natural Compounds
#42
of 260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,291
of 309,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemistry of Natural Compounds
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,266,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 260 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them