| Title |
Comparative acute toxicity of leachates from plastic products made of polypropylene, polyethylene, PVC, acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene, and epoxy to Daphnia magna
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11356-011-0663-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Delilah Lithner, Ildikó Nordensvan, Göran Dave |
| Abstract |
The large global production of plastics and their presence everywhere in the society and the environment create a need for assessing chemical hazards and risks associated with plastic products. The aims of this study were to determine and compare the toxicity of leachates from plastic products made of five plastics types and to identify the class of compounds that is causing the toxicity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 360 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 14% |
| Researcher | 35 | 10% |
| Other | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 12% |
| Unknown | 98 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 77 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 8% |
| Engineering | 25 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 11% |
| Unknown | 116 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,105,320
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#368
of 11,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,547
of 250,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,038 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.