↓ Skip to main content

Application of vaccines and dietary supplements in aquaculture: possibilities and challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fish Biology & Fisheries, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Application of vaccines and dietary supplements in aquaculture: possibilities and challenges
Published in
Reviews in Fish Biology & Fisheries, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11160-014-9361-y
Authors

Einar Ringø, Rolf Erik Olsen, Ingvill Jensen, Jaime Romero, Hélène L. Lauzon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 3 3%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 98 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 20%
Student > Master 18 17%
Researcher 18 17%
Unspecified 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 30 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 68%
Unspecified 15 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 7 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,716,394
of 12,341,768 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology & Fisheries
#235
of 316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,281
of 230,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology & Fisheries
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,341,768 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.