Also since I was spamming about books today (this will be my last tweet for the evening I swear)- this was a pretty cool paper because I detest physical books. I would have thought the break even point was quite higher than it actually is! Get a tablet!!!
291 followers
7,149 followers
@Septimus_ii @MagpieR793 https://t.co/wM5S48NyBg Interesting the disparity of numbers. This study suggests 4.7 books per year
3,037 followers
@mattywin85 @harmsy @benking01 @MikeBernersLee "The GWP of e-books read with an e-reader and the GWP of paper books were found to break even at 4.7 books per year, provided consumers read less than 11 h a day." https://t.co/gkrO7AGLYK
1,007 followers
Role of e-reader adoption in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of book reading activities https://t.co/FgybGufR4r