↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Flow-through experiments on the interaction of sandstone with Ba-rich fluids at geothermal conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Geothermal Energy, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Correction to: Flow-through experiments on the interaction of sandstone with Ba-rich fluids at geothermal conditions
Published in
Geothermal Energy, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40517-017-0083-y
Authors

Pia Orywall, Kirsten Drüppel, Dietmar Kuhn, Thomas Kohl, Michael Zimmermann, Elisabeth Eiche

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 50%
Student > Postgraduate 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2017.
All research outputs
#10,747,145
of 12,119,647 outputs
Outputs from Geothermal Energy
#47
of 86 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,066
of 285,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geothermal Energy
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,119,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.