↓ Skip to main content

Very Early Smoke Detection Apparatus (VESDA), David Packham, John Petersen, Martin Cole: 2017 DiNenno Prize

Overview of attention for article published in Fire Science Reviews, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Very Early Smoke Detection Apparatus (VESDA), David Packham, John Petersen, Martin Cole: 2017 DiNenno Prize
Published in
Fire Science Reviews, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40038-017-0019-4
Authors

Peter Johnson, Craig Beyler, Paul Croce, Chris Dubay, Margaret McNamee

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Unknown 7 70%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 30%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,393,490
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Fire Science Reviews
#8
of 19 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,570
of 339,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fire Science Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one scored the same or higher as 11 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them