↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of a beta-glucosidase from Bacillus licheniformis and its effect on bioflocculant degradation

Overview of attention for article published in AMB Express, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Characterization of a beta-glucosidase from Bacillus licheniformis and its effect on bioflocculant degradation
Published in
AMB Express, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13568-017-0501-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhen Chen, Tong Meng, Zhipeng Li, Peize Liu, Yuanpeng Wang, Ning He, Dafeng Liang

Abstract

Bacillus licheniformis CGMCC 2876, an aerobic spore-forming bacterium, produces a polysaccharide bioflocculant that is biodegradable and harmless. The present study determined that β-glucosidase played a negative role in bioflocculant synthesis. The gene encoding β-glucosidase was cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli BL21. This gene consists of 1437 bp and encodes 478 amino acid residues. The recombinant β-glucosidase (Bgl.bli1) was purified and showed a molecular mass of 53.4 kDa by SDS-PAGE. The expression and reaction conditions of Bgl.bli1 were optimized; the activity of β-glucosidase reached a maximum at 45.44 U/mL. Glucose clearly inhibited the activity of β-glucosidase. The purified recombinant Bgl.bli1 hydrolysed polysaccharide bioflocculant in vitro and synergised with other cellulases. The ability of Bgl.bli1 to hydrolyse polysaccharide bioflocculant was the reason for the decrease in flocculating activity and indicated the utility of this enzyme for diverse industrial processes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Student > Master 5 14%
Lecturer 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Chemical Engineering 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2017.
All research outputs
#15,482,347
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from AMB Express
#447
of 1,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,169
of 330,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AMB Express
#20
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,240 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.