↓ Skip to main content

Immunodeficiency in Bloom’s Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Immunology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Immunodeficiency in Bloom’s Syndrome
Published in
Journal of Clinical Immunology, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10875-017-0454-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michiel H. D. Schoenaker, Stefanie S. Henriet, Jip Zonderland, Marcel van Deuren, Qiang Pan-Hammarström, Sandra J. Posthumus-van Sluijs, Ingrid Pico-Knijnenburg, Corry M. R. Weemaes, Hanna IJspeert

Abstract

Bloom's syndrome (BS) is an autosomal recessive disease, caused by mutations in the BLM gene. This gene codes for BLM protein, which is a helicase involved in DNA repair. DNA repair is especially important for the development and maturation of the T and B cells. Since BLM is involved in DNA repair, we aimed to study if BLM deficiency affects T and B cell development and especially somatic hypermutation (SHM) and class switch recombination (CSR) processes. Clinical data of six BS patients was collected, and immunoglobulin serum levels were measured at different time points. In addition, we performed immune phenotyping of the B and T cells and analyzed the SHM and CSR in detail by analyzing IGHA and IGHG transcripts using next-generation sequencing. The serum immunoglobulin levels were relatively low, and patients had an increased number of infections. The absolute number of T, B, and NK cells were low but still in the normal range. Remarkably, all BS patients studied had a high percentage (20-80%) of CD4+ and CD8+ effector memory T cells. The process of SHM seems normal; however, the Ig subclass distribution was not normal, since the BS patients had more IGHG1 and IGHG3 transcripts. In conclusion, BS patients have low number of lymphocytes, but the immunodeficiency seems relatively mild since they have no severe or opportunistic infections. Most changes in the B cell development were seen in the CSR process; however, further studies are necessary to elucidate the exact role of BLM in CSR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 12 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Unknown 13 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2017.
All research outputs
#20,451,228
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Immunology
#1,265
of 1,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,904
of 329,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Immunology
#16
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.