↓ Skip to main content

The morphology and toxicology of plant stinging hairs

Overview of attention for article published in Botanical Review, October 1969
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
The morphology and toxicology of plant stinging hairs
Published in
Botanical Review, October 1969
DOI 10.1007/bf02858878
Authors

E. Laurence Thurston, Nels R. Lersten

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 23%
Student > Master 3 23%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 69%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 15%
Unspecified 1 8%
Design 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2014.
All research outputs
#11,070,366
of 12,452,101 outputs
Outputs from Botanical Review
#161
of 172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,485
of 232,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Botanical Review
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,452,101 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 172 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.