↓ Skip to main content

Short-term carbon input increases microbial nitrogen demand, but not microbial nitrogen mining, in a set of boreal forest soils

Overview of attention for article published in Biogeochemistry, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Short-term carbon input increases microbial nitrogen demand, but not microbial nitrogen mining, in a set of boreal forest soils
Published in
Biogeochemistry, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10533-017-0391-0
Authors

Birgit Wild, Saeed Alaei, Per Bengtson, Samuel Bodé, Pascal Boeckx, Jörg Schnecker, Werner Mayerhofer, Tobias Rütting

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 26%
Researcher 12 23%
Unspecified 8 15%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 36%
Unspecified 16 30%
Environmental Science 15 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2018.
All research outputs
#6,643,022
of 13,184,150 outputs
Outputs from Biogeochemistry
#322
of 677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,275
of 311,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogeochemistry
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,184,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.