↓ Skip to main content

Using and understanding sedation scoring systems: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, March 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
295 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
Title
Using and understanding sedation scoring systems: a systematic review
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2000
DOI 10.1007/s001340051150
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. De Jonghe, D. Cook, C. Appere-De-Vecchi, G. Guyatt, Maureen Meade, H. Outin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 136 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Postgraduate 18 13%
Student > Master 17 12%
Other 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 46 32%
Unknown 17 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 23 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,447,530
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,834
of 4,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,789
of 40,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.