↓ Skip to main content

Using and understanding sedation scoring systems: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, March 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
240 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Using and understanding sedation scoring systems: a systematic review
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2000
DOI 10.1007/s001340051150
Authors

B. De Jonghe, D. Cook, C. Appere-De-Vecchi, G. Guyatt, Maureen Meade, H. Outin

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Spain 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 98 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 15%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Postgraduate 14 13%
Other 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Other 35 33%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 70%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Unspecified 9 8%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,610,331
of 12,452,184 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,437
of 3,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,512
of 231,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#22
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,452,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.