See also "Facing Animals" by Mark Coeckelbergh & David J. Gunkel https://t.co/gBpq8tHAsv @MCoeckelbergh @David_Gunkel @Philip_Goff > https://t.co/gLsufiznRw <
@NathanNobis @sentientism No. There is an entire literature within moral philosophy that utilizes a relational approach to moral status based on Levinas. Please tell me this isn't the first you've heard of this. See works by Coeckelbergh, Gunkel (ie https:
RT @David_Gunkel: #WorldAnimalDay2020 How to reconceptualize the moral status of animals and our response to and responsibilities in the fa…
RT @David_Gunkel: #WorldAnimalDay2020 How to reconceptualize the moral status of animals and our response to and responsibilities in the fa…
RT @David_Gunkel: #WorldAnimalDay2020 How to reconceptualize the moral status of animals and our response to and responsibilities in the fa…
#WorldAnimalDay2020 How to reconceptualize the moral status of animals and our response to and responsibilities in the face of other forms of otherness. With @MCoeckelbergh https://t.co/tELcoQqLmo https://t.co/KOoHiWSFwH
That’s enough for me :o)
RT @David_Gunkel: "Why we cannot find a clear line marking which animals are conscious." Really interesting and insightful scientific resea…
RT @David_Gunkel: "Why we cannot find a clear line marking which animals are conscious." Really interesting and insightful scientific resea…
"Why we cannot find a clear line marking which animals are conscious." Really interesting and insightful scientific research that backs-up much of the the moral philosophical work that @MCoeckelbergh and I have been doing in this area. https://t.co/tELcoQq
@sentientism @the_eco_thought @JoshGellers @PabloRedux @PKathrani @StenderWorld @eripsa @grok_ @drkatedevlin @MCoeckelbergh @mitpress This is essay, which I wrote with @MCoeckelbergh and published in one of the @SpringerEthics journals, might provide quick
@Inframethod @SurviveThrive2 None of this is easy. Some animals are treated as raw materials and food. Other animals are treated as members of the family. Sometimes the same kind of animal is treated in one way in one context and the other way in another c
@danfaggella @MCoeckelbergh Bunches of stuff: https://t.co/tELcoQqLmo https://t.co/2WKisOehH1 Final chapter of #robotright @mitpress Second chapter of 3rd Wave HCI book If you slam your head into a paywall, let me know. I can send you copies via email. h
@Lilyfrank16 @danfaggella Yeah....@MCoeckelbergh and I try to work through and grapple with this issue/problem in a paper we co-authored a few years ago. https://t.co/tELcoQqLmo https://t.co/UxomX2IRtm https://t.co/nzNWu62gWI
@Carolyn_Ten @PabloRedux @sd_marlow @PKathrani @YouTube @EmergTechEthics @anki This is a really complicated question. At one time, dogs were property and people who had dogs were called "dog owners." Now our language (and our concepts) have "evolved." We d
@KrysNorman @EmergTechEthics @g8enjamin Following @PeterSinger and others, this procedure has good traction. The problem with it--the problem with all such "properties" is that it it makes ethics derivative of ontology. @MCoeckelbergh and I have been worki
If you’re interested, I’m discussing relational ontologies and their significance for thinking about human rights in a forthcoming chapter (part of Critical Perspectives on Human Rights, which will be published by @RowmanInternat)
Starting to see a pattern.... #robotrights is #9 on this list of the "Top 9 Ethical Issues in Artificial Intelligence" from @q_worldeconomic https://t.co/tELcoQqLmo https://t.co/4qtnXVuSsL
Nicely formulated infographic from @JohnDanaher The critique of the properties approach to deciding moral status developed by @MCoeckelbergh and myself in a number of places including this essay on #AnimalRights from @SpringerEthics https://t.co/tELcoQqLmo
RT @David_Gunkel: If you missed it back in February or just need another jolt....here is @JohnDanaher's insightful and engaging critical re…
RT @David_Gunkel: If you missed it back in February or just need another jolt....here is @JohnDanaher's insightful and engaging critical re…
RT @David_Gunkel: If you missed it back in February or just need another jolt....here is @JohnDanaher's insightful and engaging critical re…
RT @David_Gunkel: If you missed it back in February or just need another jolt....here is @JohnDanaher's insightful and engaging critical re…
RT @David_Gunkel: If you missed it back in February or just need another jolt....here is @JohnDanaher's insightful and engaging critical re…
If you missed it back in February or just need another jolt....here is @JohnDanaher's insightful and engaging critical reading of "Facing Animals," an essay that @MCoeckelbergh and I published in "Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics." https://
@EyeOnThePitch @David_Gunkel @sd_marlow @mitpress Now looking at https://t.co/44oqunWK7W It's a good read, @MCoeckelbergh I can see that asking where we stand, how we should act in our relations with the world is useful. I think we also need to ask ourselv
@SteveCooke @PKathrani @PabloRedux @J_Savim @johnchavens @IEEEorg @IEEESA @mitpress @EmergTechEthics @NonhumanRights "Sentience" often functions as a stand-in for other ill-defined metaphysical concepts like "consciousness" or "soul." This is what @MCoecke
RT @David_Gunkel: @PabloRedux @j2bryson @MCoeckelbergh Spot on...and a very good point. @MCoeckelbergh and I have tried to deal with this i…
@BVLSingler @MCoeckelbergh and I have been barking up this tree for years. It is part and parcel of what we have called the "social relational approach" to deciding questions of moral status (or the "relational turn" in moral philosophy). Here is one versi
@PabloRedux @j2bryson @MCoeckelbergh Spot on...and a very good point. @MCoeckelbergh and I have tried to deal with this in our co-authored paper on animal rights philosophy. https://t.co/L0Hr9mlARx
@NoelSharkey @jgcarpenter @j2bryson @drkatedevlin @robmccargow @maria_axente @vdignum @Chopalong @tabithagold @KayFButterfield @aimeevanrobot @intellethics @cccalum @DanitGal @LukeRobertMason @MCoeckelbergh Oops...my mistake. I linked to Piekarski's respon