| Title |
ADHD and Working Memory: The Impact of Central Executive Deficits and Exceeding Storage/Rehearsal Capacity on Observed Inattentive Behavior
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10802-009-9357-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael J. Kofler, Mark D. Rapport, Jennifer Bolden, Dustin E. Sarver, Joseph S. Raiker |
| Abstract |
Inattentive behavior is considered a core and pervasive feature of ADHD; however, an alternative model challenges this premise and hypothesizes a functional relationship between working memory deficits and inattentive behavior. The current study investigated whether inattentive behavior in children with ADHD is functionally related to the domain-general central executive and/or subsidiary storage/rehearsal components of working memory. Objective observations of children's attentive behavior by independent observers were conducted while children with ADHD (n = 15) and typically developing children (n = 14) completed counterbalanced tasks that differentially manipulated central executive, phonological storage/rehearsal, and visuospatial storage/rehearsal demands. Results of latent variable and effect size confidence interval analyses revealed two conditions that completely accounted for the attentive behavior deficits in children with ADHD: (a) placing demands on central executive processing, the effect of which is evident under even low cognitive loads, and (b) exceeding storage/rehearsal capacity, which has similar effects on children with ADHD and typically developing children but occurs at lower cognitive loads for children with ADHD. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 276 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 14% |
| Researcher | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 11% |
| Other | 42 | 15% |
| Unknown | 65 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 137 | 48% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Unknown | 69 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#914,217
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#67
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,318
of 106,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.