↓ Skip to main content

Weak hydrothermal carbonation of the Ongeluk volcanics: evidence for low CO2 concentrations in seawater and atmosphere during the Paleoproterozoic global glaciation

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Weak hydrothermal carbonation of the Ongeluk volcanics: evidence for low CO2 concentrations in seawater and atmosphere during the Paleoproterozoic global glaciation
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40645-017-0145-6
Authors

Takazo Shibuya, Tsuyoshi Komiya, Ken Takai, Shigenori Maruyama, Michael J. Russell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 35%
Other 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 55%
Unspecified 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Unknown 6 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#14,561,111
of 24,826,104 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#249
of 576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,114
of 333,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,826,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.