↓ Skip to main content

A performance comparison of data and memory allocation strategies for sequence aligners on NUMA architectures

Overview of attention for article published in Cluster Computing, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
A performance comparison of data and memory allocation strategies for sequence aligners on NUMA architectures
Published in
Cluster Computing, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10586-017-1015-0
Authors

Josefina Lenis, Miquel Angel Senar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 44%
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 22%
Engineering 1 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2017.
All research outputs
#9,634,955
of 12,043,827 outputs
Outputs from Cluster Computing
#87
of 112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,974
of 284,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cluster Computing
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,043,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 112 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.