| Title |
Pollinator assemblages on dandelions and white clover in urban and suburban lawns
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Insect Conservation, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10841-014-9694-9 |
| Authors |
Jonathan L. Larson, Adam J. Kesheimer, Daniel A. Potter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 21% |
| United States | 3 | 10% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 72% |
| Scientists | 7 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 184 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 17% |
| Researcher | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 44 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 85 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 39 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 51 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 158. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#263,973
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Conservation
#8
of 736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,255
of 250,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Conservation
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 736 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.