↓ Skip to main content

An expressive voting model of anger, hatred, harm and shame

Overview of attention for article published in Public Choice, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
An expressive voting model of anger, hatred, harm and shame
Published in
Public Choice, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11127-017-0480-6
Authors

Dwight R. Lee, Ryan H. Murphy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 75%
Researcher 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 50%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2022.
All research outputs
#15,103,697
of 23,985,711 outputs
Outputs from Public Choice
#969
of 1,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,924
of 330,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Choice
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,985,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.