↓ Skip to main content

Spread of common native and invasive grasses and ruderal trees following anthropogenic disturbances in a tropical dry forest

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Processes, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Spread of common native and invasive grasses and ruderal trees following anthropogenic disturbances in a tropical dry forest
Published in
Ecological Processes, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13717-017-0103-7
Authors

Xavier A. Jaime, Skip J. Van Bloem, Frank H. Koch, Stacy A. C. Nelson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 29%
Student > Bachelor 5 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Professor 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 33%
Environmental Science 6 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 3 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2017.
All research outputs
#9,616,850
of 12,019,430 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Processes
#62
of 74 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,185
of 284,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Processes
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,019,430 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 74 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.