Title |
Assessment of recovery status in chronic fatigue syndrome using normative data
|
---|---|
Published in |
Quality of Life Research, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11136-014-0819-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alem Matthees |
Abstract |
Adamowicz et al. have reviewed criteria previously employed to define recovery in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). They suggested such criteria have generally lacked stringency and consistency between studies and recommended future research should require "normalization of symptoms and functioning". |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 16 | 31% |
United States | 4 | 8% |
Australia | 2 | 4% |
Ireland | 2 | 4% |
Belgium | 2 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 22 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 45 | 88% |
Scientists | 2 | 4% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
Researcher | 4 | 15% |
Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 26% |
Psychology | 3 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 10 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2019.
All research outputs
#496,739
of 25,299,129 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#18
of 3,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,023
of 263,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#2
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,299,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.