RT @tavoni_massimo: congrats Neil! given the uncertainty of climate engineering, mitigation should not be reduced. We showed this to hold…
RT @tavoni_massimo: congrats Neil! given the uncertainty of climate engineering, mitigation should not be reduced. We showed this to hold…
congrats Neil! given the uncertainty of climate engineering, mitigation should not be reduced. We showed this to hold also for SRM using theory and a stochastic IAM @JohannesEmm https://t.co/9bpXKZ6Xsh https://t.co/kWNdqc9RmK
In simple models, SRM substitutes for abatement, and thus also for CDR. But making models more realistic (e.g. add uncertainty) leads to much lower substitutabilty (still no complementarity) see https://t.co/4scK5aaBUz @JohannesEmm
RT @oscare2000: #Climate Engineering and Abatement: A ‘flat’ Relationship Under Uncertainty https://t.co/fFJ9IKGqpE #Geoengineering #Scie…
#Climate Engineering and Abatement: A ‘flat’ Relationship Under Uncertainty https://t.co/fFJ9IKGqpE #Geoengineering #Science #Tech #Energy