Title |
Expression of Concern to: Evaluation of patients with multiple sclerosis using reverse nutech functional score and expanded disability status scale after human embryonic stem cell therapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical and Translational Medicine, September 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40169-017-0167-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Geeta Shroff |
Abstract |
The Editors-in-Chief of Clinical and Translational Medicine are issuing an editorial expression of concern to alert readers that concerns have been raised regarding the ethics of this study [1]. Appropriate editorial action will be taken once this has been fully investigated. The author disagrees with this notice. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 33% |
Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 1 | 33% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 33% |
Engineering | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2017.
All research outputs
#5,931,161
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#194
of 869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,202
of 318,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.