↓ Skip to main content

A thrombotic storm

Overview of attention for article published in Internal and Emergency Medicine, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
A thrombotic storm
Published in
Internal and Emergency Medicine, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11739-016-1577-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Damanti, Andrea Artoni, Tiziano Lucchi, Pier Mannuccio Mannucci, Daniela Mari, Luigi Bergamaschini

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 43%
Professor 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 57%
Unspecified 2 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2017.
All research outputs
#9,614,584
of 12,016,495 outputs
Outputs from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#236
of 357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,370
of 283,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,016,495 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 357 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.