↓ Skip to main content

How individual needs influence motivation effects: a neuroscientific study on McClelland’s need theory

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Managerial Science, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
How individual needs influence motivation effects: a neuroscientific study on McClelland’s need theory
Published in
Review of Managerial Science, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11846-017-0252-1
Authors

Robert Rybnicek, Sabine Bergner, Alfred Gutschelhofer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Unspecified 4 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 15%
Student > Master 4 15%
Other 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 7 27%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 23%
Computer Science 3 12%
Psychology 2 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 7 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2017.
All research outputs
#10,649,821
of 12,009,062 outputs
Outputs from Review of Managerial Science
#34
of 41 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,400
of 284,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Managerial Science
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,009,062 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one scored the same or higher as 7 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.