↓ Skip to main content

International Banking and Liquidity Risk Transmission: Evidence from Italy

Overview of attention for article published in IMF Economic Review, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
International Banking and Liquidity Risk Transmission: Evidence from Italy
Published in
IMF Economic Review, December 2015
DOI 10.1057/imfer.2015.22
Authors

Marianna Caccavaio, Luisa Carpinelli, Giuseppe Marinelli, Enrico Sette

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 38%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2017.
All research outputs
#18,574,814
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from IMF Economic Review
#191
of 213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,053
of 391,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IMF Economic Review
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.