↓ Skip to main content

International Banking and Liquidity Risk Transmission: Evidence from Italy

Overview of attention for article published in IMF Economic Review, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
International Banking and Liquidity Risk Transmission: Evidence from Italy
Published in
IMF Economic Review, December 2015
DOI 10.1057/imfer.2015.22
Authors

Marianna Caccavaio, Luisa Carpinelli, Giuseppe Marinelli, Enrico Sette

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2017.
All research outputs
#9,608,016
of 12,009,062 outputs
Outputs from IMF Economic Review
#80
of 110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,519
of 284,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IMF Economic Review
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,009,062 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.