↓ Skip to main content

Model comparison of soil processes in eastern Canada using DayCent, DNDC and STICS

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 506)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Model comparison of soil processes in eastern Canada using DayCent, DNDC and STICS
Published in
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10705-017-9880-8
Authors

G. Guest, R. Kröbel, B. Grant, W. Smith, J. Sansoulet, E. Pattey, R. Desjardins, G. Jégo, N. Tremblay, G. Tremblay

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Lecturer 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 28%
Environmental Science 14 21%
Engineering 6 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 20 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,699,539
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
#43
of 506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,991
of 325,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 506 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.