@IEthics @JoshGellers @evijitghosh @David_Gunkel @mitpress If it were one article, I would recommend this one by @David_Gunkel. It is relatively short and contains an overview of the positions that are discussed in the literature: https://t.co/N9fZA1FBo6
@docdanmarques @lizweil @NYMag Full explanation of the different regions of the map available in #robotrights @mitpress https://t.co/ZD19lDNGLF Shorter version can be found in this #OpenAccess article from "Ethics and Info Tech" @SpringerEthics https://t
@leftoblique @Morilac @mitpress 1) It is widely available in most university & public libraries. 2) An #openaccess version is available: https://t.co/RxoyApj3Dm 3) For students & researchers without access to these resource, I ask that they contact
@justMathana @FrontRoboticsAI @SvenNyholm @KamilMamak @MCoeckelbergh The most complete and detailed versions are developed in the books, i.e. #robotrights @mitpress and "Growing Moral Relations" @Palgrave etc. But these articles can get you started: http
@NathanNobis @JoshGellers @JamieWoodhouse @MCoeckelbergh @Palgrave @mitpress Really?...You are asking me to repackage over a decade of research into a 480 character tweet? The research has been published and is available in a number of different venues. If
https://t.co/9NTyNZCaJh "This essay addresses the other side of the robot ethics debate, taking up and investigating the question "Can and should robots have rights?" #philofutures #ethics #philosophy #Robots #rights #tuesdayvibes
@Mike10four @sentientism @StenderWorld @JoshGellers @MCoeckelbergh @PabloRedux @the_eco_thought @PKathrani @eripsa @grok_ @drkatedevlin @Palgrave_ @mitpress Interesting. Thanks..I will definitely give it a look. It could (from what I can see from a quick s
@realhumanrights @RWTHalert @franzhitzehaus @mitpress @q_mitmedialab @EdmontonOilers @MIT I also publish and publicize this work in academic journals, public meetings, popular media, and the classroom. Here's a sample. Full list of stuff at https://t.co/Vm
@carl_b_sachs @eripsa @Abebab @Wolven FYI - The article from @SpringerEthics "The Other Question: Can and Should Robots have Rights?" is a preliminary sketch of what eventually becomes #robotrights @mitpress https://t.co/eyj2idNF2F https://t.co/rYevTOITMM
@Eric0Lawton @sd_marlow @Abebab @theblub @PabloRedux @evansd66 @j2bryson @romanyam Sorry, did not see this. It appears that you have read the title to my @mitpress book #robotrights (and maybe even the publisher's description), but clearly not much beyond
@keithfrankish @JoshGellers @MCoeckelbergh @j2bryson @JohnDanaher Excellent...I have been inviting/imploring others to join the debate since the mid 2000's. If interested...here's some reading material that can (hopefully) help: https://t.co/rYevTOITMM h
@Tiresias999 No purchase necessary: The @SpringerEthics article is open access and available for FREE. https://t.co/rYevTOITMM The Introduction to #robotrights @mitpress is published in pdf format on the book website and available for FREE without obligat
@Tiresias999 Here you go.... The full version: #robotrights @mitpress https://t.co/eyj2idNF2F https://t.co/eseHcOjyd3 Short (article) version: https://t.co/rYevTOITMM @SpringerEthics https://t.co/4RlEf235DQ
RT @future_of_AI: The other question: can and should robots have rights? https://t.co/kP8LnldCyb #AI #Ethics via @David_Gunkel
The other question: can and should robots have rights? https://t.co/kP8LnldCyb #AI #Ethics via @David_Gunkel
@Faust_III Your argument seems to be "although this is possible, it should be rejected." This "can but should not" is only one modality that can be derived from the Humean is/ought distinction. It sounds entirely reasonable, but it has its own set of compl
I make mention of @David_Gunkel's 2017 paper here (https://t.co/6Jfs6eUCxd), as well as mention and reference @JohnDanaher's work on ethical behaviorism, which is an interesting (and probably overlooked) "property" that might be considered for this thought
@nevaudit @dawna327 @farbandish @WellsLucasSanto @benjammingh @russss @Google On robot rights? These are the good: https://t.co/uLWlhRnsz7 https://t.co/0x76bBcWEe
Video epigraph (featuring Jeff Goldblum) for the #robotrights project. Why didn't I think of that?
@EthicsInBricks This https://t.co/kCcqHjA44e followed by launching into Hume's is/ought problem (with contemporary examples by @David_Gunkel - https://t.co/W37mH2EqEs)
The other question: can and should robots have rights? https://t.co/kP8LnldCyb #AI #Ethics via @David_Gunkel
@eripsa @tonyjprescott @PabloRedux @morungos @sir_deenicus @PKathrani @EmergTechEthics @sd_marlow @mitpress Had not thought of it in these terms, but the analysis is spot on. Related...Here is the "quick and dirty" version of the critique that I initiall
RT @David_Gunkel: Yep...social robot as "quasi-other." We're already on this one. Short version here - https://t.co/rYevTOITMM The longer (…
RT @David_Gunkel: @aimeevanrobot Another case of trying (really really hard) to answer the wrong question. Predicating rights on consciousn…
@aimeevanrobot Another case of trying (really really hard) to answer the wrong question. Predicating rights on consciousness (SOP for the "properties approach" to deciding moral/legal status) is a non-starter for both moral philosophy and legal theory. ht
RT @David_Gunkel: Yep...social robot as "quasi-other." We're already on this one. Short version here - https://t.co/rYevTOITMM The longer (…
RT @David_Gunkel: Yep...social robot as "quasi-other." We're already on this one. Short version here - https://t.co/rYevTOITMM The longer (…
Today from @cynthiabreazeal in @qz - "Social robots will become family members in the homes of the future." Yep...and we are already on this one. Short version here: https://t.co/rYevTOITMM Long version from @mitpress https://t.co/eyj2idNF2F https://t.
RT @David_Gunkel: Today in from @cynthiabreazeal in @qz - "Social robots will become family members in the homes of the future." Yep...and…
Yep...social robot as "quasi-other." We're already on this one. Short version here - https://t.co/rYevTOITMM The longer (more extended analysis) from @mitpress - https://t.co/eyj2idNF2F
@BNTYD1 @JohnDanaher @MCoeckelbergh If you want a full serving of social relational deliciousness, I can recommend the following essays along with these two books. https://t.co/zIeSgh3G6V https://t.co/rYevTOITMM https://t.co/bFbulb6Hvf
RT @David_Gunkel: @PKathrani @MrsGingerLawyer And you can read a bunch online for free : ) Here - https://t.co/eseHcOjyd3 And here - https:…
@PKathrani @MrsGingerLawyer And you can read a bunch online for free : ) Here - https://t.co/eseHcOjyd3 And here - https://t.co/rYevTOITMM
RT @David_Gunkel: Really useful Infographic for #robotrights courtesy of @JohnDanaher's thoughtful reading of and critical response to the…
Really useful Infographic for #robotrights courtesy of @JohnDanaher's thoughtful reading of and critical response to the essay "The Other Question: Can and Should Robots have Rights?" https://t.co/rYevTOITMM
@CamiloGuezRodri @j2bryson @NetizenFour @thevimblog @vdignum @johnchavens @ShannonVallor @alan_winfield @eu_Robotics @KayFButterfield @NoelSharkey @katinamichael @ruchowdh @Rafael_A_Calvo Agreed....so all the cards (well maybe not all, but a good amount) o
@bellur Precisely the reason why @MCoeckelbergh and I have advocated for and developed a social relational theory of #robot #ethics. Details of this "relational turn" in ethics can be found in the #robotrights essays (if interested): https://t.co/TsoDPEx
@issagaro Again I agree with you. But it is you who are lingering in the shallows. Try reading something deeper than a 280 character tweet using a metaphor for the purposes of a shorthand introduction to a book. And if books ain't your thing, try this: ht
@costrike Respectfully...what do you know about what I think? This is an assumption you have made based on a 280 character tweet. Not much to go on. For the full and complete story, try the #robotrights book @mitpress https://t.co/eyj2idNF2F or this short
@LunacyNow You need to check out @j2bryson's "Robots Should be Slaves," which gets considerable attention in the #robotrights book--along with a number of other essays that propose version of (what I have been calling) Slavery 2.0. You can find a short ver
@TobiGretenkort See here: can and should robots have rights? https://t.co/Egd6zfzeBR
@Anicca_Crypto @ComBotLabs @TeachGuz @mitpress Pro-tip: Instead of getting triggered by what you think is meant by a title, read the material and find out what it is really about. From this position, you can then build a much more informed and informative
@LeverhulmeCFI @DrDihal Brilliant analysis and presentation...... For an even deeper dive into this material: https://t.co/rYevTOITMM https://t.co/eyj2idNF2F @mitpress
We are definitely in a #robotrights moment. @TEDxThess talk from @DrDihal concerning robot personhood. https://t.co/fPBWzYIa9F And for an even deeper dive into this material: https://t.co/rYevTOITMM #robotrights @mitpress https://t.co/eyj2idNF2F https://
@SpringerEthics informs me that the #robotrights essay (the shorter version and sketch of the @mitpress book) has now been downloaded 6392 times since it first appeared online in Oct 2017. Whether it has actually been read is another matter. @AuthorZone
@JBAGerritsen @MullerCatelijne On #robotrights see https://t.co/eyj2idNF2F coming in Sept from @mitpress and the open access article https://t.co/rYevTOITMM On the legal aspects of robot personhood, see @A_Bensoussan and @JBLexing "Droit des Robots: Orie
RT @David_Gunkel: @gwsrobotics @NoelSharkey Just for clarification....The #robotrights project evaluates the various arguments both for and…
RT @David_Gunkel: @gwsrobotics @NoelSharkey Just for clarification....The #robotrights project evaluates the various arguments both for and…
RT @David_Gunkel: @gwsrobotics @NoelSharkey Just for clarification....The #robotrights project evaluates the various arguments both for and…
RT @David_Gunkel: @gwsrobotics @NoelSharkey Just for clarification....The #robotrights project evaluates the various arguments both for and…
@gwsrobotics @NoelSharkey Just for clarification....The #robotrights project evaluates the various arguments both for and against in order to map the debate. It is a philosophical project and not the work of advocacy. Preview here: https://t.co/rYevTOITMM
@HughDaimonia @PKathrani @michaelhornsey @PabloRedux @EmergTechEthics @sd_marlow For a deep-dive into this material, which will answer this and may other questions check the following: https://t.co/rYevTOITMM https://t.co/eyj2idNF2F https://t.co/M1MDh1rRjp
RT @David_Gunkel: Shout out to the #robotrights essay @SpringerEthics. Now available both online and in print. https://t.co/rYevTOITMM Than…
Shout out to the #robotrights essay @SpringerEthics. Now available both online and in print. https://t.co/rYevTOITMM Thanks! https://t.co/6JAF2AE6b8
@eripsa @g8enjamin @EmergTechEthics @PKathrani @j2bryson @NoelSharkey @sd_marlow @BVLSingler @PabloRedux @ProfKRichardson @MCoeckelbergh @maryCyPsy Exactly....and what I have identified as and called "asceticism" in both the journal article and the #robotr
@bengoertzel That I knew....and this is one of the reasons why your work figures rather prominently in the #robotrights project. The short version is here: https://t.co/rYevTOITMM The longer and more developed version will be out in a few weeks from @mitpr
@j2bryson Nice....but please do not pin the "Kantian Fallacy" on me. It is an argument made (in its strongest version) by @grok_. But I am, in both the journal article and the #robotrights book, extremely critical of its underlying logic and consequences.
@maxtalksai @smatthewliao @LeverhulmeCFI Dude has got to do some home work. This issue is way more complicated and interesting. Simple reductionist thinking like this actually helps no one. https://t.co/rYevTOITMM https://t.co/yXzctxC5sa https://t.co/EjU
@dennajones @hayfestival @NonhumanRights You assume that I am concerned with "sentient robots"...but that is a strawman argument. #robotrights is far more complex and includes a number of different modalities and forms. If interested, short version here: h
@reworkpippa @oxangiemarie Some material that might be of interest to you: https://t.co/rYevTOITMM https://t.co/nTP536bPCM #robotrights @mitpress https://t.co/eyj2idNF2F https://t.co/86q5u8kzWJ
@RecklessCoding @PabloRedux @RobWortham @EmergTechEthics @ProfKRichardson @PKathrani @sd_marlow @A_Bensoussan @JBLexing @EU_Commission @jgcarpenter @cynthiabreazeal @RoboNarratives @j2bryson Dude...I just wrote a 50 page response to this work in #robotrigh
@PKathrani @EmergTechEthics @huascarespinoza @ASciFiLawyer @PabloRedux @sd_marlow @j2bryson This is why I call it "Asceticism" in both the essay and the book. https://t.co/rYevTOITMM
@RecklessCoding @j2bryson @BathIMI For a critical reading/perspective on @j2bryson's "ascetic" approach to AI/robot design, this might be of some use: https://t.co/rYevTOITMM Soon to be followed by a more elaborate treatment in the #robotrights book from @
RT @David_Gunkel: @PKathrani @NickJRishwain @YaduBhargavan @PabloRedux @EmergTechEthics @sd_marlow @NickJRishwain looking forward to giving…
@PKathrani @NickJRishwain @YaduBhargavan @PabloRedux @EmergTechEthics @sd_marlow @NickJRishwain looking forward to giving your text a read. The #robotrights book will be out from @mitpress later this summer. For a short preview of its contents, you can che
@David_Gunkel @PKathrani @___effe @sd_marlow @EmergTechEthics @ruthmalan @ArtBourbon @Abebab @GraziosiSergio David, having got that far I reread a review of your Remixology and https://t.co/I7irWsNYwU Instead of is/ought, and closer to your Levinas flip, p
@NeurolawGuy The short explanation is here https://t.co/rYevTOrioc The longer, more elaborate version is in the @mitpress book #robotrights. But it all has to do with they way policy is formulated. Check this item from @Floridi https://t.co/PUcDEzUcMR
@SteveCooke @PKathrani @PabloRedux @J_Savim @johnchavens @IEEEorg @IEEESA @mitpress @EmergTechEthics @NonhumanRights @MCoeckelbergh We definitely try....hopefully we deliver. Another one that might help (especially with the Levinas) is this one. https://
@EmergTechEthics @PKathrani @sd_marlow @PabloRedux @Slate @JohnAFlood Here's the "quick and dirty" version of the trajectory of the argument. This one taken from https://t.co/rYevTOITMM The book just provides a more elaborate and detailed version. https://
@FullArtIntel Thanks. This might help with item #10. https://t.co/rYevTOrioc
@David_Gunkel @SvenNyholm @briandavidearp @V_Eleuteria The Sparrow/Singer way of thinking leaves open the question of how to evaluate consciousness. Defining and evaluating this important. Only panpsychists might assume Samantha has subjective experience.
RT @David_Gunkel: @SvenNyholm @mark_ledwich @briandavidearp @V_Eleuteria And if interested....a short version of the book's argument can be…
RT @David_Gunkel: @SvenNyholm @mark_ledwich @briandavidearp @V_Eleuteria And if interested....a short version of the book's argument can be…
@SvenNyholm @mark_ledwich @briandavidearp @V_Eleuteria And if interested....a short version of the book's argument can be obtained here: https://t.co/rYevTOITMM (But there is much more about sex robots and the question of rights in the forthcoming book).
@Aelkus @PabloRedux @kaznatcheev @ArtBourbon @sd_marlow @Abebab @JohnKubie @PKathrani @EmergTechEthics @somesheep @rishmitra @j2bryson @GraziosiSergio @mitpress @Aelkus, thanks for the read. "Thinking Otherwise" is 2007 and only has one chapter on #ai/#rob
@J_Savim @johnchavens @timleberecht @IEEEorg @IEEESA Also (and at risk of #shamelessplug), the recognized variability and alterability of the legal status of A/IS has been systematically mapped by the #robotrights project. Short version here: https://t.co/
RT @David_Gunkel: @joaovc...when it comes to the question of #robotrights, we now have something of a triad of journal articles (and all op…
@joaovc...when it comes to the question of #robotrights, we now have something of a triad of journal articles (and all open access): https://t.co/TsoDPExdrY https://t.co/rYevTOITMM https://t.co/zBWTsC5MuX https://t.co/W5prCjj3xJ
@PabloRedux @PKathrani @EmergTechEthics @tonyjprescott @j2bryson @Forbes @JohnAFlood @PhilCorlett1 @alan_winfield @JiboRobot Beach is probably a good idea. If you want something to help sort out the verbs and make sense of the interplay of ontology and eth
@brianlfrye @j2bryson @FrankPasquale @brianlfrye...Really looking forward to reading your paper. About the same time you posted to SSRN, I published this essay. It will be followed by a book-length analysis from @mitpress called "Robot Rights," which will
RT @robotenomics: The other question: can and should #robots have rights? by @David_Gunkel https://t.co/ej5dvMj8PZ
RT @gdumouchel: Can and should robots have rights? https://t.co/Zp3cwZRGyf (open access article) #robots #AI #ethics https://t.co/DujsRdhA…
Can and should robots have rights? https://t.co/Zp3cwZRGyf (open access article) #robots #AI #ethics https://t.co/DujsRdhAes
RT @David_Gunkel: @johnchavens @mitpress There is also (I think) a pretty clear articulation of "my stance" (for what ever that is worth) i…
@johnchavens @mitpress There is also (I think) a pretty clear articulation of "my stance" (for what ever that is worth) in these two publications: https://t.co/rYevTOITMM https://t.co/bImtDmo8Tt
@PabloRedux @MCoeckelbergh @JohnDanaher @PKathrani @JohnAFlood @lisawebley @TheNakedLawyer @JoannaMG22 Eventually (in a couple months) there will be the @mitpress book #robotrights. Until that time, you might want to check out this: https://t.co/rYevTOITM
RT @David_Gunkel: @vdignum @MCoeckelbergh My answer....the short version is here https://t.co/rYevTOITMM The longer, more elaborate version…
@vdignum @MCoeckelbergh My answer....the short version is here https://t.co/rYevTOITMM The longer, more elaborate version will be available in the @mitpress book #robotrights..coming, stay tuned.
RT @David_Gunkel: Mapping the #robotrights debate. Want to know what it means? Start with this https://t.co/rYevTOITMM (soon to be follow…
Very interesting debate on #robotrights. I'm not sure where exactly I fall on the spectrum, but from my current understanding of robotics (and the current state-of-the-art) robots should not have rights 🤔 https://t.co/MUuTroyV4K
RT @David_Gunkel: Mapping the #robotrights debate. Want to know what it means? Start with this https://t.co/rYevTOITMM (soon to be follow…
The other question: can and should #robots have rights? by @David_Gunkel https://t.co/ej5dvMj8PZ
Mapping the #robotrights debate. Want to know what it means? Start with this https://t.co/rYevTOITMM (soon to be followed by the @mitpress book), then check out workshop #11 - Moral Status of Robots at #Robophilosophy https://t.co/7t2JSNgpxg https://t.c