Title |
Utilization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance Among American Patients: A Systematic Review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11606-011-1952-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amit G. Singal, Adam Yopp, Celette S. Skinner, Milton Packer, William M. Lee, Jasmin A. Tiro |
Abstract |
Although surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is recommended in high-risk patients, several studies have suggested it is being underutilized in clinical practice. The aim of our study was to quantify utilization rates for HCC surveillance among patients with cirrhosis and summarize patterns of association between utilization rates and patient socio-demographic characteristics. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Norway | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 92 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 18% |
Other | 11 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
Other | 21 | 22% |
Unknown | 21 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 46% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 7% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Unknown | 27 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,165,947
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#968
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,629
of 250,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#5
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.