↓ Skip to main content

A review on procedures for the preparation of coatings for solid phase microextraction

Overview of attention for article published in Microchimica Acta, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
A review on procedures for the preparation of coatings for solid phase microextraction
Published in
Microchimica Acta, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00604-014-1265-y
Authors

Mohammad Ovais Aziz-Zanjani, Ali Mehdinia

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 33%
Student > Master 17 26%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 41 62%
Unspecified 13 20%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Materials Science 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 3 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2014.
All research outputs
#10,383,581
of 13,017,746 outputs
Outputs from Microchimica Acta
#377
of 669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,339
of 212,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microchimica Acta
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,017,746 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 669 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.