↓ Skip to main content

Point-of-care transcranial Doppler by intensivists

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Ultrasound Journal, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 182)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
157 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
Title
Point-of-care transcranial Doppler by intensivists
Published in
Critical Ultrasound Journal, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13089-017-0077-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincent Issac Lau, Robert Thomas Arntfield

Abstract

In the unconscious patient, there is a diagnostic void between the neurologic physical exam, and more invasive, costly and potentially harmful investigations. Transcranial color-coded sonography and two-dimensional transcranial Doppler imaging of the brain have the potential to be a middle ground to bridge this gap for certain diagnoses. With the increasing availability of point-of-care ultrasound devices, coupled with the need for rapid diagnosis of deteriorating neurologic patients, intensivists may be trained to perform point-of-care transcranial Doppler at the bedside. The feasibility and value of this technique in the intensive care unit to help rule-in specific intra-cranial pathologies will form the focus of this article. The proposed scope for point-of-care transcranial Doppler for the intensivist will be put forth and illustrated using four representative cases: presence of midline shift, vasospasm, raised intra-cranial pressure, and progression of cerebral circulatory arrest. We will review the technical details, including methods of image acquisition and interpretation. Common pitfalls and limitations of point-of-care transcranial Doppler will also be reviewed, as they must be understood for accurate diagnoses during interpretation, as well as the drawbacks and inadequacies of the modality in general.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 157 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 162 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 28 17%
Other 24 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 36 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 56%
Neuroscience 12 7%
Engineering 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 47 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2022.
All research outputs
#344,872
of 22,543,472 outputs
Outputs from Critical Ultrasound Journal
#4
of 182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,836
of 301,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Ultrasound Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,543,472 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them