↓ Skip to main content

Durable Democracy? Economic Inequality and Democratic Accountability in the New Gilded Age

Overview of attention for article published in Political Behavior, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Durable Democracy? Economic Inequality and Democratic Accountability in the New Gilded Age
Published in
Political Behavior, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11109-017-9435-3
Authors

Benjamin J. Newman, Thomas J. Hayes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 75%
Lecturer 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 8 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2017.
All research outputs
#2,847,454
of 12,002,078 outputs
Outputs from Political Behavior
#258
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,343
of 275,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Political Behavior
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,002,078 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.