↓ Skip to main content

Studying monoids is not enough to study multiplicative properties of rings: an elementary approach

Overview of attention for article published in Arabian Journal of Mathematics, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
Title
Studying monoids is not enough to study multiplicative properties of rings: an elementary approach
Published in
Arabian Journal of Mathematics, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40065-014-0118-1
Authors

Marco Fontana, Muhammad Zafrullah

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,306,972
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Arabian Journal of Mathematics
#8
of 19 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,178
of 252,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arabian Journal of Mathematics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one scored the same or higher as 11 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them