“To navigate safely in the vast sea of empirical facts”

@Undercoverhist @VergaraFMelissa @d_lopezmo @dandolfa Here’s a paper that argues on Weberian grounds that totally false models can be epistemically helpful: https://t.co/l5GGRHz24H (w/ apologies for the self-promotion)

@fabghisellini @behscientist Happy you should ask. I have a whole paper on this: https://t.co/l5GGRHz24H

@AlanLevinovitz …and cannot do. This is the best source: https://t.co/E7Kgr2ZjXb I’ve contributed too: https://t.co/l5GGRHz24H

@BrianCAlbrecht @Undercoverhist @PeterBoettke Like this? https://t.co/l5GGRHz24H

For what it’s worth, I tried to summarize Weber’s views on abstraction and idealization here: http://t.co/l5GGRHz24H (Sec. 2)

…And there’s nothing wrong with that: theory confers many benefits. Quote from http://t.co/OWreC3J5l0 http://t.co/xzbXnv3q7D

…And there’s nothing wrong with that: theory confers many benefits. Quote from http://t.co/OWreC3J5l0 http://t.co/xzbXnv3q7D

@BrianCAlbrecht Models are your friends: http://t.co/l5GGRHz24H

On #behavioral_economics' love-hate relationship to neoclassical economics. By @ErikAngner http://t.co/PTGnT9vKuT

.@trengriffin @JamesLKimmel @Noahpinion @R_Thaler Hate to defend the orthodoxy but there’s a lot of value to std econ http://t.co/l5GGRHz24H

RT @ErikAngner: My new paper on neoclassical vs. #behavioraleconomics is now available from Springer http://t.co/46DIuoBc0R

Adding to my @evernote now. MT @ErikAngner: My new paper on neoclassical vs. #behavioraleconomics is now available: http://t.co/yJTK1tqsTh

My new paper on neoclassical vs. #behavioraleconomics is now available from Springer http://t.co/HL08HDeZbL