Better than angry pushback, a nuanced, critical reframing https://t.co/tpnPz4Xdgo @LaurelinTransit More equitable, holistic (re:driving costs, safety) & effective (chasing "choice" riders w/ congestion/peak oriented service neither new nor effective h
Article mentions core ridership: socioeconomically disadvantaged & travelers where parking difficult/expensive. W/o leveling of car advantage (via parking $, congested roadways v exclusive transit ROW, pricing) replacing car trips difficult for one act
RT @TransportJrnl: This Washington Post article cites our paper - Public transportation objectives and rider demographics: are transit’s pr…
This Washington Post article cites our paper - Public transportation objectives and rider demographics: are transit’s priorities poor public policy? . Read that paper here for free https://t.co/3cKPQCOfFK
@urbanizationist Public transport to outer suburbs could be elitist policy as well if it’s at the expensive of improving public transport for more urban pops. where people need it more https://t.co/5l2SvVIDnh
@BrittanyAmofah @AllenMankewich @ZachFleish @lizzshearer @mmmollymcc @northendmc @FTWinnipeg This is a very real problem faced in many cities that invest in transit. It emerges from a philosophy that discretionary riders (ones who are able to afford a car
When transit decisions become poor public policy: "We contend that efforts to secure popular support for transit... https://t.co/x94sUkDRFm
RT @SLOCATCornie: Political support for mass #transit in the US lack of focus on #poor and transit dependent. https://t.co/noSRTnrJHr https…
Political support for mass #transit in the US lack of focus on #poor and transit dependent. https://t.co/noSRTnrJHr https://t.co/zY0AX7uVcn
Interesting research on equity & public transit: "Are transit’s priorities poor public policy?" http://t.co/9c8I8rchqR #springerlink
Dir. Taylor's new article: Public transit objectives & rider demographics: are transit’s priorities poor pub. policy? http://t.co/ZDYkPN6pnZ