↓ Skip to main content

An evaluation of primers for microsatellite markers in Scarlet Macaw (Ara macao) and their performance in a Peruvian wild population

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Genetics Resources, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
An evaluation of primers for microsatellite markers in Scarlet Macaw (Ara macao) and their performance in a Peruvian wild population
Published in
Conservation Genetics Resources, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12686-014-0317-2
Authors

George Olah, Robert G. Heinsohn, Jose R. Espinoza, Donald J. Brightsmith, Rod Peakall

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 31%
Student > Bachelor 4 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Other 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Other 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2015.
All research outputs
#7,777,506
of 13,038,232 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics Resources
#126
of 249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,147
of 202,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics Resources
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,038,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 249 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.