↓ Skip to main content

``Wet Voice'' as a Predictor of Penetration and Aspiration in Oropharyngeal Dysphagia

Overview of attention for article published in Dysphagia (0179051X), April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 790)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
``Wet Voice'' as a Predictor of Penetration and Aspiration in Oropharyngeal Dysphagia
Published in
Dysphagia (0179051X), April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s004550010005
Authors

Tanya Warms, Jennifer Richards

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Other 9 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Unspecified 3 7%
Other 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 22%
Unspecified 6 13%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Linguistics 3 7%
Other 2 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2018.
All research outputs
#577,316
of 12,834,493 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia (0179051X)
#20
of 790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,063
of 201,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia (0179051X)
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,834,493 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.