| Title |
``Wet Voice'' as a Predictor of Penetration and Aspiration in Oropharyngeal Dysphagia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dysphagia, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s004550010005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tanya Warms, Jennifer Richards |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 23% |
| United States | 5 | 17% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 83% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 18% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 22% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Linguistics | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,357,103
of 24,149,630 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#49
of 1,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,794
of 230,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,149,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.