↓ Skip to main content

Bonus versus penalty: How robust are the effects of contract framing?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Economic Science Association, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Bonus versus penalty: How robust are the effects of contract framing?
Published in
Journal of the Economic Science Association, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40881-017-0039-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan de Quidt, Francesco Fallucchi, Felix Kölle, Daniele Nosenzo, Simone Quercia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 6%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 28%
Student > Master 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Lecturer 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 36%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 11%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2017.
All research outputs
#6,331,200
of 25,478,886 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Economic Science Association
#20
of 78 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,490
of 327,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Economic Science Association
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,478,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them