Title |
Treatment effects of the Jasper Jumper and the Bionator associated with fixed appliances
|
---|---|
Published in |
Progress in Orthodontics, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40510-014-0054-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Leniana Santos Neves, Guilherme Janson, Rodrigo Hermont Cançado, Karina Jerônimo Rodrigues Santiago de Lima, Thaís Maria Freire Fernandes, José Fernando Castanha Henriques |
Abstract |
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of Class II malocclusion treatment with the Jasper Jumper and the Bionator, associated with fixed appliances. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 74 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 21% |
Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 12% |
Unknown | 21 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 67% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
Materials Science | 1 | 1% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 22 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,653,708
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#203
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,733
of 248,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.