↓ Skip to main content

3-Dimensional Necklace Flower Constellations

Overview of attention for article published in Celestial Mechanics & Dynamical Astronomy, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
3-Dimensional Necklace Flower Constellations
Published in
Celestial Mechanics & Dynamical Astronomy, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10569-017-9789-1
Authors

David Arnas, Daniel Casanova, Eva Tresaco, Daniele Mortari

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 50%
Unspecified 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Engineering 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2017.
All research outputs
#10,392,182
of 13,030,298 outputs
Outputs from Celestial Mechanics & Dynamical Astronomy
#211
of 283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,188
of 270,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Celestial Mechanics & Dynamical Astronomy
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,030,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.