RT @IrisVanRooij: 19. van Rooij, I., Wright, C. & Wareham, H.T. (2012). Intractability and the use of heuristics in psychological explana…
RT @IrisVanRooij: 19. van Rooij, I., Wright, C. & Wareham, H.T. (2012). Intractability and the use of heuristics in psychological explana…
RT @IrisVanRooij: 19. van Rooij, I., Wright, C. & Wareham, H.T. (2012). Intractability and the use of heuristics in psychological explana…
19. van Rooij, I., Wright, C. & Wareham, H.T. (2012). Intractability and the use of heuristics in psychological explanations. Synthese. 187,471-487. https://t.co/8M35GGwqRs
RT @IrisVanRooij: @o_guest 💯 On heuristics: https://t.co/8M35GGwqRs (I recall Todd and I having particularly fun with this result, >12 year…
@o_guest 💯 On heuristics: https://t.co/8M35GGwqRs (I recall Todd and I having particularly fun with this result, >12 years ago 🙃) https://t.co/lknx3N5llk
RT @Arshiya_San: Thread on misconceptions about NP problems. The cogsci literature on NP problems & questions of computational tractability…
RT @Arshiya_San: Thread on misconceptions about NP problems. The cogsci literature on NP problems & questions of computational tractability…
Thread on misconceptions about NP problems. The cogsci literature on NP problems & questions of computational tractability is fascinating! Some cool papers: https://t.co/gZ1KHWpdsj https://t.co/3TJSRaw8xK And an incredibly intuitive intro to NP probl
Intractability and the use of heuristics in psychological explanations https://t.co/AvfhwIHFv1
RT @JoelChan86: That analysis depends on a previous formal analysis that argues that scientific discovery is an NP-hard problem, and trying…
RT @JoelChan86: That analysis depends on a previous formal analysis that argues that scientific discovery is an NP-hard problem, and trying…
That analysis depends on a previous formal analysis that argues that scientific discovery is an NP-hard problem, and trying to proceduralize discovery risks basically pretending that P=NP. https://t.co/U5nQI6nmmQ https://t.co/3kWLuQFCft
RT @IrisVanRooij: @sir_deenicus @mattsiegel Much of my published work since then is about this issue: Intractability of models of cognition…
RT @IrisVanRooij: @sir_deenicus @mattsiegel Much of my published work since then is about this issue: Intractability of models of cognition…
RT @IrisVanRooij: @sir_deenicus @mattsiegel Much of my published work since then is about this issue: Intractability of models of cognition…
@sir_deenicus @mattsiegel Much of my published work since then is about this issue: Intractability of models of cognition, and how (not) to cope with that. That 2006 paper was rejected for the #CogSci conference but grew into this paper (among others): htt
RT @PhilSciArchive: Intractability and the use of heuristics in psychological explanations https://t.co/49WM2xHfwD https://t.co/H1kXAf4Hgj
Intractability and the use of heuristics in psychological explanations https://t.co/49WM2xHfwD https://t.co/H1kXAf4Hgj
#OA Synthese! Intractability & use of heuristics in psychological explanations https://t.co/AAoGNvmLaP
@elliotthoey @njenfield You may be interested in this: http://t.co/Zs8vT92WOO #intractability #heuristics